Speech & ASR Evaluations Index

Index of evaluations and experiments assessing Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and Speech-to-Text (STT) system performance under various conditions.

Last updated: 06/04/2026

Speech & ASR Evaluations Index

Index of evaluations and experiments assessing Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and Speech-to-Text (STT) system performance under various conditions.

Author: Daniel Rosehill Related Index: Experiments-And-Evaluations-Index

GitHub Repository danielrosehill/Experiments-And-Evaluations-Index View on GitHub

Evaluations

Oct 2025 — Local Whisper Model Comparison

Question: What is the difference in accuracy between various Whisper models on local inference, and how do derivative engines compare against original Whisper?

Links: GitHub

GitHub Repository danielrosehill/Local-ASR-STT-Benchmark View on GitHub

Summary: Benchmarked multiple Whisper model variants running locally on AMD GPU hardware (ROCm) through Speech Note on Ubuntu. Compared stock Whisper models of different sizes and derivative engines to identify the best-performing local STT option for the hardware.

Nov 2025 — Long-Form Audio Transcription

Question: How do ASR systems perform on extended audio recordings compared to shorter clips?

Links: GitHub

GitHub Repository danielrosehill/Long-Form-Audio-Eval View on GitHub

Summary: Single-shot STT benchmark focused on long-form audio. Evaluated how transcription quality degrades or holds up as recording length increases beyond typical short-clip evaluation sets.

Nov 2025 — Podcast ASR Evaluation

Question: How accurately do ASR systems transcribe podcast-style audio?

Links: Dataset

Hugging Face Dataset danielrosehill/Podcast-ASR-Evaluation ↓ 18Updated Nov 2025 View dataset on Hugging Face

Summary: Evaluation of ASR performance on podcast recordings, testing how conversational speech patterns, multiple speakers, and natural audio quality affect transcription accuracy.

Nov 2025 — STT System Comparison

Question: How do different STT systems compare head-to-head on the same audio inputs?

Links: Space

Hugging Face Space danielrosehill/STT-Comparison Open the Space

Summary: Side-by-side comparison of multiple STT systems on identical test audio, providing a direct performance comparison across providers.

Nov 2025 — English-Hebrew Code-Switched Speech

Question: How well do standard STT systems handle code-switched English-Hebrew speech patterns common among English-speaking immigrants in Israel?

Links: Dataset

Hugging Face Dataset danielrosehill/English-Hebrew-Mixed-Sentences ↓ 130MITUpdated Oct 2026 View dataset on Hugging Face

Summary: Created 516 audio-text pairs of English sentences with naturally interspersed Hebrew words across domains like government, healthcare, and documents. Tests how well ASR handles the kind of mixed-language speech typical of Anglophones living in Israel.

Nov 2025 — Whisper Fine-Tune vs Commercial APIs

Question: Can fine-tuning Whisper achieve measurable WER reductions, even when comparing local inference against cloud-based commercial models?

Links: Dataset · Space

Hugging Face Dataset danielrosehill/Whisper-Fine-Tune-One-Shot-Eval A "back of the envelope" evaluation comparing fine-tuned Whisper models running locally against commercial ASR APIs via Eden AI. ↓ 42Updated Nov 2025 View dataset on Hugging Face Hugging Face Space danielrosehill/Whisper-Fine-Tune-Eval Open the Space

Summary: Fine-tuned Whisper Large Turbo running locally achieved 5.84% WER, beating the best commercial API (Assembly AI) tested via Eden AI. Demonstrates that even a quick fine-tune on personal voice data can outperform paid cloud ASR services.

Nov 2025 — Tech Vocabulary ASR Training Data

Question: Can a specialized speech dataset improve ASR performance on technical and developer vocabulary?

Links: Dataset

Hugging Face Dataset danielrosehill/Tech-Sentences-For-ASR-Training A specialized speech dataset for fine-tuning Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models on technical and developer vocabulary. Contains human-recorded audio samples covering software engineering, cloud infrastructure,… ↓ 329♥ 2Automatic speech recognitionMITUpdated Oct 2026 View dataset on Hugging Face

Summary: Work-in-progress dataset of 205 human-recorded samples (38 min, 10K words) targeting developer and technical vocabulary for Whisper fine-tuning. Covers software engineering terms, GitHub references, and programming jargon that stock models commonly misrecognize.

Nov 2025 — Voice-to-Vector RAG Pipeline Test

Question: Can voice data be reliably transcribed, structured, and upserted into a vector database for accurate retrieval?

Links: Dataset

Hugging Face Dataset danielrosehill/Sample-Voice-Context-Data A small synthetic dataset containing LLM-generated context information simulating a job seeker narrating their career trajectory. ↓ 54MITUpdated Oct 2026 View dataset on Hugging Face

Summary: Synthetic dataset simulating a job seeker narrating career trajectory, used to test a voice-to-vector-database RAG pipeline: MP3 → transcription → structured context → Pinecone/Ragie upsert → retrieval accuracy evaluation.

Dec 2025 — Microphone Selection Impact

Question: To what extent does microphone selection affect ASR transcription accuracy?

Links: GitHub

GitHub Repository danielrosehill/Microphone-Audio-Samples View on GitHub

Summary: Collected test samples across various microphones and evaluated STT accuracy differences. Tests whether hardware choice meaningfully impacts transcription quality for the same speaker and content.

Dec 2025 — WPM & Background Noise Impact

Question: To what extent do background noise and variations in speaking pace (WPM) affect ASR transcription accuracy as measured by Word Error Rate (WER)?

Links: GitHub · Dataset

GitHub Repository danielrosehill/Whisper-WPM-Background-Noise-Eval View on GitHub Hugging Face Dataset danielrosehill/ASR-WPM-And-Background-Noise-Eval A dataset of annotated audio recordings for evaluating how different factors affect Whisper (and other ASR/STT systems) transcription accuracy. ↓ 122♥ 1Automatic speech recognitionMITUpdated Dec 2025 View dataset on Hugging Face

Summary: Controlled evaluation testing Whisper across multiple variables: speaking pace (fast, normal, slow, whispered, loud), background noise types (cafe, music, conversations, transit, traffic, sirens, dogs, baby sounds), and microphone distance (close, normal, far). Annotated audio recordings with WER measurements for each condition.

Dec 2025 — Transcription Cleanup Evaluation

Question: How do various cloud audio understanding models perform on the transcribe-and-cleanup workflow?

Links: GitHub

GitHub Repository danielrosehill/Transcription-Cleanup-Eval-1225 View on GitHub

Summary: Evaluated multiple cloud-based audio understanding models on their ability to not just transcribe but also clean up and format transcriptions. Compared end-to-end quality of the combined transcription + post-processing pipeline.

Dec 2025 — Fine-Tuned vs Stock Whisper Models

Question: How much accuracy improvement can be achieved through fine-tuning Whisper models compared to stock models on local inference?

Links: GitHub (1) · GitHub (2) · Dataset

GitHub Repository danielrosehill/Fine-Tune-Accuracy-Evaluation View on GitHub GitHub Repository danielrosehill/Whisper-Fine-Tune-Accuracy-Eval Comparing Whisper fine-tunes versus stock Whisper on local inference ★ 1PythonUpdated Dec 2025 asraudio-evalsevaluationevaluationsstt View on GitHub Hugging Face Dataset danielrosehill/Small-STT-Eval-Audio-Dataset A small speech-to-text evaluation dataset containing 92 audio samples with ground truth transcriptions. Designed for evaluating STT systems on technical vocabulary, code-switching (English/Hebrew), and various speaking… ↓ 87♥ 1Automatic speech recognitionCC-BY-4.0Updated Oct 2026 View dataset on Hugging Face

Summary: Compared fine-tuned Whisper against stock Whisper on local inference using a 92-sample evaluation dataset covering technical vocabulary, English-Hebrew code-switching, and various speaking styles. Ground truth transcriptions provided for WER measurement.

Mar 2026 — Gemini 3.1 Lite Audio Understanding

Question: How well does Gemini 3.1 Lite handle audio understanding tasks beyond simple transcription?

Links: GitHub · Dataset · Space

GitHub Repository danielrosehill/Gemini-31-Lite-Audio-Understanding-Eval View on GitHub Hugging Face Dataset danielrosehill/Audio-Understanding-Test-Set A structured dataset for evaluating audio understanding capabilities of multimodal AI models. Contains 137 test prompts across 22 categories, paired with a 20-minute voice sample and 49 completed model outputs from… ↓ 47Audio classificationCC-BY-4.0Updated Oct 2026 View dataset on Hugging Face Hugging Face Space danielrosehill/Audio-Understanding-Experiment Open the Space

Summary: Tested Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite on 137 prompts across 22 categories paired with a 20-minute voice sample. Categories include speaker analysis, emotion detection, audio engineering, voice cloning, and forensic audio. 49 completed model outputs demonstrate the model's capabilities and limitations across diverse audio understanding tasks.

Mar 2026 — Single-Shot ASR Evaluation

Links: Space

Hugging Face Space danielrosehill/Single-Shot-ASR-Eval Open the Space

Summary: Single-shot evaluation interface for quick ASR benchmarking against individual audio samples.

Datasets

Spaces

License

MIT